
(PatriotNews.net) – In a stunning display of judicial activism, a federal judge has put the brakes on President Trump’s executive order aimed at protecting America’s youth from the dangers of gender-affirming care.
At a Glance
- Federal judge halts Trump’s executive order restricting gender-affirming care for minors
- Order threatened to withdraw funding from institutions providing such care
- Ruling follows lawsuit by families of transgender children and LGBTQ+ advocacy groups
- Critics argue gender-affirming care can cause irreversible damage to minors
Judicial Overreach or Constitutional Crisis?
Once again, we find ourselves watching from the sidelines as unelected judges wield their gavels like scepters, striking down common-sense measures designed to protect our nation’s children. U.S. District Judge Lauren King, a Biden appointee (surprise, surprise), has temporarily halted President Trump’s executive order that sought to restrict access to so-called “gender-affirming care” for individuals under 19.
This latest example of judicial overreach stems from a lawsuit filed by Democrat-led states and families with transgender children, arguing that the order deprives youth of “essential medical care.” Essential? Let’s be clear: we’re talking about experimental treatments that can permanently alter a child’s body and future.
A federal judge paused President Donald Trump's executive order on restricting gender-affirming care for people under the age of 19.https://t.co/KtUlrG3NVn
— 7News DC (@7NewsDC) February 14, 2025
The Left’s Assault on Common Sense
The irony is palpable. The same crowd that cries foul over giving children sugary drinks now champions pumping them full of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones. The lawsuit, backed by LGBTQ+ advocacy groups, claims Trump’s order “jeopardizes the health” of transgender youth. But what about the long-term health consequences of these irreversible medical interventions?
“It is an official statement of bigotry from the president that directs agencies to openly discriminate against vulnerable youth on the basis of their transgender status and sex.” – state officials.
Bigotry? How about protecting children from making life-altering decisions before they’re old enough to vote or buy a beer? The real discrimination here is against common sense and parental rights.
The Voice of Reason in the Wilderness
Amidst this madness, some voices of reason emerge. Chloe Cole, a detransitioner who underwent gender-affirming procedures as a minor, is now suing Kaiser Permanente for the irreversible damage done to her young body. Her story is a stark reminder of the real-world consequences of these reckless medical practices.
“was an exciting and symbolic first step but it’s clear it isn’t enough.” – Chloe Cole.
Activist Gabrielle Clark hits the nail on the head, calling for legislative action to protect minors from the “atrocity of gender-affirming care.” It’s high time we put the well-being of our children above the agenda of radical activists and their enablers in the judicial system.
Copyright 2025, PatriotNews.net