
(PatriotNews.net) – Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass’s divisive proposal to compensate wildfire recovery czars ended in public uproar and eventual retraction.
At a Glance
- Mayor Bass reversed a decision to pay Steve Soboroff $500,000 for 90 days of work.
- Initial funding was meant to come from charities, which remain undisclosed.
- Both Soboroff and Randy Johnson will now work pro bono.
- Criticism from public figures labeled the compensation as “obscene.”
Public Outcry Against Compensation Plan
The controversy began when Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass proposed paying $500,000 to Steve Soboroff for 90 days as the chief recovery officer. Randy Johnson would receive $250,000 to support Soboroff. The funds were sourced from undisclosed charities, not city coffers. This proposal was condemned by city council members and residents as excessively lucrative, given the roles’ nature and need for transparency in civic financial dealings.
This financial plan drew sharp criticism from public figures. Ric Grenell labeled it “gross” and “offensive,” suggesting an exploitation of the charitable premise.
Mayor Bass eventually withdrew the compensation plan amid rising backlash. Soboroff defended his worthiness for the original amount, citing essential roles in coordinating with federal agencies and offering advice on infrastructure rebuilding. However, he accepted working pro bono to avoid distractions from recovery efforts.
From Paid Compensation to Volunteer Commitment
Soboroff offered multiple defenses for his proposed payment. He claimed his position required a commitment far beyond typical civic duties, emphasizing he had worked on similar projects pro bono for decades before being asked to prioritize this work. However, public pressure saw he and Johnson stepping up to fulfill these roles without pay.
“I’ve been doing this for 35 years for free…But nobody ever asked me to drop everything. This time they did.” – Steve Soboroff
Amidst the ongoing scrutiny, Soboroff and Johnson’s willingness to work for free could bolster community confidence as they manage recovery efforts without financial burdens amidst recovery calls for transparency.
The Need for Transparency and Competent Leadership
The backlash over the compensation highlighted frustrations with a lack of transparency in civic administrative decisions. Residents have long expressed concerns over transparency and leadership accountability as the area seeks recovery from devastating wildfires. Moving forward, efforts remain focused on effective recovery processes without the blight of financial controversies.
“Steve is always there for LA…We agree that we don’t need anything distracting from the recovery work we’re doing.” – Karen Bass
Ensuring transparency in recovery planning and city communications continues to be a priority, especially in preserving public trust and maintaining integrity across leadership and recovery initiatives.
Copyright 2025, PatriotNews.net